Archive for the 'Credit Reports' Category

Ten ways to check on your credit

Friday, February 26th, 2010

By Nick Gardner 

From: News Limited newspapers February 23, 2010 9:32AM

WE all have a credit record that collects data about us, but few of us know what it says or what is allowed to be shown.

Here are 10 things you should know about the system, and what is going to change when new laws come in next year:

1. There’s no blacklist

At the moment, your credit record simply details “bad” behaviour such as defaults, bankruptcies and court judgments. Different companies assess you in different ways, so somebody may get refused credit by one company, but accepted by somebody else.

2. Positive reporting

Currently, credit agencies collect only negative information such as defaults and bankruptcies but under comprehensive reporting, credit agencies will be able to collect extra information, including repayment histories. “So even if you’ve had trouble in the past, you will be able to work off much of the impact of any earlier misdemeanours,” says Christine Christian, chief executive of agency Dun & Bradstreet.

3. Don’t be lateComprehensive reporting will capture more bad behaviour. Late payments on credit cards or utility bills, even if just a few days late, will be noted.
 

4. High limits hurt

It’s the outstanding limit on your credit card, not the balance that counts. “This can be particularly damaging when applying for a mortgage because having a $10,000 limit even with nothing owing can reduce the amount you can borrow by tens of thousands of dollars,” says Mortgage Choice broker John Manciameli.

5. Offences aren’t equal

Dun & Bradstreet says there is a sliding scale for offences. For example, a default from five years ago is less damaging than a default in recent months.

6. A long recovery

Defaults stay on your record for up to five years and bankruptcies for up to seven. A default a late payment of 60 days or more can severely impact your ability to get credit.
 

7. Shopping around

If you go from shop to shop and allow the assistant to check if you would qualify for credit, this is logged. Most lenders interpret these as refusals, even if you didn’t buy anything.
 

8. Small defaults count

Even a default worth just a few dollars on a mobile phone bill could result in the refusal of a mortgage application later on.
 

9. Divorce debt

If you have joint accounts, even in divorce you will be equally liable for the debts and your credit file damaged. “You need to be very wary before entering into a joint agreement over which you have little control,” Christian says.

10. Checking is easy

Check your credit record regularly to ensure it is accurate. Big agencies such as Dun & Bradstreet or Veda Advantage offer free access to your file in about 10 days.

 

Get credit where credit’s due

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

By Alex Tilbury | January 10, 2010 11:00pm 
couriermail.com.au

FOR too long, banks and other lenders have judged your credit risk based on failed applications and defaults, but that is changing.

Positive credit reporting is coming, and if you are a good bill payer, you should be able to use it to your advantage.

Many Australians don’t understand how their credit report is compiled and are unaware of the information credit providers use to make their lending decisions.

At present, your credit report will list all loan applications but not whether they were approved, any defaults of more than 90 days and bankruptcies.Essentially all the bad stuff.

The good stuff won’t be counted until 2011.

Financial planner Joel Palmer of Palmer Portfolios says every time you apply for finance or default on a payment, the details are recorded in a database that is accessed by all financial institutions.

“If you apply for 27 credit cards in two months, or miss a few too many payments, you’ll end up with a black mark against your name and find it next to impossible to obtain new finance,'’ he says.

“Positive credit reporting forces banks and credit card companies to report our good qualities, not just the bad. “Let’s say you’ve had a home loan for 15 years, never missed a payment, and always had your credit card under control.

“If Australia had a positive credit reporting system, you would then show up on the database as an extremely good credit risk.

“The major benefit for you is that banks will then be falling over themselves to lend you money.'’

Credit reporting agency Dun & Bradstreet’s chief executive, Christine Christian, says positive credit reporting is used in the US and other developed countries.

“People think paying an overdue debt will remove the listing from their credit report: This is untrue. Negative records such as collection accounts, late payments and bankruptcies stay on your credit report for up to seven years, even if you pay them off,'’ she says.

Ms Christian says people wrongly think low-value or non-bank debts are less important than big ticket items such as a home mortgage.

“The size of the debt and its source is irrelevant all negative payment behaviours will be listed on your credit report,'’ she says.Anyone can access a free copy of their credit report through a credit reporting bureau.
 
 
       

 

 

 

Cast off the load of debt

Saturday, August 1st, 2009

TWENTY-FIVE Queenslanders declare themselves bankrupt or insolvent every day to escape their creditors.

Source: couriermail.com.au
Article by: Jason Bryce
July 26, 2009 12:00am

Many do so over relatively small debts of less than $20,000.

Bankruptcy is no longer the shameful option of last resort for heavily indebted bad investors or misguided entrepreneurs.

Modern bankrupts are mostly ordinary family men and women taking advantage of a relatively easy and cheap escape route from debt.

“Punishment-free” bankruptcy is now being proposed by the Rudd government in response to “changing economic conditions” and a desire to get bankrupts back to work and contributing to society.

A “co-operative” bankrupt could be back in business almost right away if all creditors can be identified quickly.

The current period of bankruptcy is three years, during which a bankrupt person lives under tight travel and financial restrictions. The Commonwealth Attorney-General, Robert McClelland, wants to slash that period to 12 months or less.

“A maximum of 12 months is considered more than adequate for the trustee to obtain all the information necessary to identify assets and debts, determine any possible liability to make income contributions and develop a plan to administer the estate.

“An undischarged bankrupt whose financial failure was the result of changing economic conditions is prevented from contributing to the economy,” McClelland wrote to industry groups such as the bankers association. “This does not increase returns to creditors and can only be seen as some form of punishment.”

Former chartered accountant Fred Appleton is a former bankrupt who now has a booming business helping other people declare themselves bankrupt and start again.

“If someone asks me whether they should go bankrupt, I say yes every time,” he says. “If you are struggling and it is affecting your life, the chances are that your best option is bankruptcy and that’s nothing to be ashamed of anymore.

“If you think you are insolvent, you are and I say “don’t wait’, go bankrupt and start your life, and your financial life too, all over again.”

In the three months to the end of June, Queensland bankruptcies were up 12 per cent and consumer debt agreements up 26 per cent while total insolvency activity went down in NSW (-4.3 per cent) and just barely edged up in Victoria (2.1 per cent).

Up to 2279 Queenslanders went bankrupt or insolvent in the three months to June 30, according to the Insolvency Trustee Service of Australia.

The number of new consumer debt agreements, marketed heavily as debt management and consolidation options for consumers who can not repay their credit cards and unsecured loans, are up 26 per cent in Queensland.

But many more Queenslanders are choosing outright bankruptcy to escape their creditors.

Most people with debts under the $80,000 debt, income and asset thresholds for a debt agreement are still better off considering a full bankruptcy, Appleton says.

“Debt agreements are expensive and administrator fees are very high, whereas with bankruptcy there are basically no long-term disadvantages,” he says.
Appleton thinks the proposed reforms are a big step forward.

“I applaud that something is now being done to address the fact that most bankruptcies are the result of misfortune rather than misdeeds,” he says.
“Bankruptcy saved my life.”

However, the name and details of bankrupts stay on a government register of bankrupt persons for life

“But so what?” Appleton says. “That makes absolutely no difference to the majority of people.

Phone: 1300 735 161

www.mrsmortgage.com.au

Revealing the debt pushers - THEY claim to act responsibly

Sunday, January 18th, 2009

Article from: Jason Bryce
November 24, 2007 12:00am
heraldsun.com

THEY claim to act responsibly, but lenders still aim at the young, the uninformed and those already deep in debt, writes Jason Bryce.

Kasey* from Boronia has an addiction that is affecting her work, her health, her relationships, in fact every aspect of her life.

It is not shady drug pushers that have hooked her on a downward spiral with limited opportunities for escape, it has been some of Australia’s biggest, richest, most respected ASX-listed companies.

Kasey is addicted to credit. When she sees advertising offering her money, she applies.

At just 23, Kasey has racked up more than a quarter of a million dollars of debt. Her minimum monthly repayments outstrip her income by almost $500.

“I’m kind of addicted to finances (sic). Now I’m up s–t creek without a paddle.”

Now that her repayments are more than her income, you might think the financial institutions would stop lending her money, but you’d be wrong.

Just last month, she applied to GE Money for another personal loan of $7000. Not only was the $7000 approved, she was offered $10,000.

“I answered all their questions honestly and told them about all my other debts and my income,” says Kasey. “When I was on the phone to them, I was actually kind of thinking to myself. ‘God, I hope they don’t approve this’.”

Of course no one forced Kasey to take on all that debt; she has got herself into this situation. But there is no doubt that she has been actively encouraged all the way.

Even if Kasey didn’t tell the whole truth about her finances when she applied for that last loan, a quick scan of her credit reference file would have indicated that she has applied for many credit cards, personal loans and a big mortgage very recently. Just that information should have rung alarm bells.

She is a classic preferred customer of the debt pushers — she has a property (a small flat) that can be sold if everything else fails, and she is addicted to debt to fund spending.

Kasey might be in big financial trouble at just 23, but at least she isn’t officially bankrupt, unlike Matt*.

Matt, 25, is a shop assistant from Reservoir, the eldest of four children. He has used credit cards and personal loans to help his single mother with family expenses. Matt entered into a debt agreement (under part nine of the Bankruptcy Act) with his creditors in April 2006 after he ran up $47,000 in unsecured debt to ANZ, Citibank and GE.

His debt agreement means he is legally insolvent. The agreement remains on his credit reference file for seven years.

You might think that no lender would touch an insolvent person, but you would be wrong.

Recently, Matt was approved for a CreditLine card he applied for at The Good Guys in Thomastown. Matt’s debt agreement has now failed and he is filing for full bankruptcy.

GE Money corporate affairs manager Geoff Lynch says: “We would not knowingly extend credit to customers receiving unemployment benefits, who are insolvent or who, for any other reason, are over-extended.”

However, Mr Lynch says, sometimes genuine mistakes are made in the approval process.

“GE Money is a responsible lender and we take that obligation very seriously. It is certainly not in our interest to have customers default on their repayments.”

It may not be in a lender’s interest to have their customers default, but it is also not in their interest for customers to be paying back their cards and loans quickly.

Carolyn Bond, co-chief executive of the Consumer Action Law Centre, says: “Lenders are targeting the people who struggle a little bit to pay off the balances.

“The people who can’t pay their credit card off, but don’t default completely, are the most profitable customers for the lenders.”

The number of defaults and bankruptcies is skyrocketing despite the long economic boom. The number of Victorian bankruptcies and insolvencies is four times higher now than at the peak of the last recession, in 1989-90.

To reduce debt problems, lenders say they need access to more information about us in our credit reference files. GE Money is one lender that has been at the forefront of this debate, pushing for comprehensive credit reporting reform.

Mike Cutter, GE Money’s president and chief executive for Australia and New Zealand, told banking industry newsletter The Sheet in July: “We want full positive credit reporting because it tells lenders how people are managing their existing credit accounts.

“That is the best indicator of whether a person is able to take on more credit.”

The current system of credit reporting includes all applications for credit made in the past five years, bankruptcies, insolvencies, and usually any previous defaults.

That’s more than enough information to raise questions about Kasey and Matt’s ability to repay, even if they lied about their finances when applying.

Also undermining the arguments of the lenders in this debate is the fact that many institutions are approving credit to distressed borrowers more than once.

A good example is retrenched storeman Jacek*, from Narre Warren.

In addition to two mortgages, a big personal loan and credit card all from St George Bank, he has two American Express cards and two Commonwealth Bank credit cards. He also has two car loans and three other credit cards.

Even if St George, Amex and Commonwealth didn’t get enough information from his credit reference file to inform their decisions, they definitely did know what they themselves had lent him in the past, and his atrocious record of paying that credit back.

“Increasingly lenders are targeting people with debt already and people with equity on their homes,” says Carolyn Bond “There is nothing in their current lending practices to indicate that more information would produce more responsible lending.

“I have concerns that more information in credit reference files might create more debt marketing opportunities,” she says. “A person might apply for $5000 for example, then the lender sees they have a lot of other debt and says, ‘Do you want $100,000 to consolidate all that?”‘

Many people in the industry of debt consolidation, refinancing and debt assistance agree that lenders have well and truly headed down-market.

Donna Elliott, a mortgage broker and debt administrator based in Malvern, says: “The theory is that you can afford it if you can cover the interest — that way the lender can get a full whack of interest each and every month.

“Sometimes they work on the premise that a person only needs to repay 3 per cent of their total outstanding balance each month.”

Once they are in debt and feeling the stress of high repayments, Elliott says people are less likely to make clear decisions and plan sensibly.

“A lot of people with debt problems are suffering severe stress or depression,” she says. “They become very reactive and don’t make clear decisions.”

Dave* is an unemployed courier from Geelong trying to overcome a gambling problem he paid for with credit cards. Dave says he has been depressed since he lost his job and marriage, and readily admits that he did lie when applying for his numerous cards.

“It’s definitely a two way street,” he says. “I have been really stupid, but they encouraged me all the way. I was never asked to prove my income.

“Loneliness and depression sent me to the TAB. Now sometimes I think, ‘What’s the point of living?’ There’s a lot of people going through the same feelings as me.”
Kasey is in just that situation now.

“People say to me, ‘You are 23 — how can you have health problems from stress?’ But they don’t know the trouble I have got into.

“Now I have a stomach ulcer, I suffer from depression and anxiety, I’m secluded and my relationships are suffering,” she says.

With a good job and salary, Kasey should be enjoying the best times of her life.

Instead she is suffering from the same kind of symptoms that a drug addict might have. She is addicted to debt.

*Cases-names have been changed.

Phone: 1300 735 161

www.mrsmortgage.com.au

Conduct unbecoming - Debt Collection & Debt Collectors

Monday, July 28th, 2008

* SOURCE: Lesley Parker - The Age 12th June 2008


Agencies are cracking down on harassment from debt collectors. Regulators have warned that they are keeping a sharp lookout for breaches of laws governing debt collection, as higher interest rates, rising petrol costs and a possible economic downturn put household budgets under financial pressure, pushing bills into arrears…

This follows a high-profile case in which the Australian Securities and Investments Commission found that subsidiaries of GE Money had used unreasonable debt collection tactics, such as contacting debtors at their workplaces.

ASIC and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission last year released a joint consumer guide to dealing with debt collectors, noting a steady increase in consumer complaints in this area last year.

The latter’s deputy chairwoman, Louise Sylvan, says that in 2008, “We still have complaints, no doubt about that - it takes quite a while to get some of these behaviours out of the markets.”

And with economic conditions putting household finances under pressure, she agrees there’s the potential for complaints to ratchet up.

“We haven’t seen greatly rising complaints this year but these things often have long ‘tails’ - sometimes you don’t see it for quite a while,” she says.

“A lot of industry people want to improve their practice and I think that’s happened. Nevertheless, sometimes it is still the case that people cross the line. We want to police that very carefully … If we see increased complaints, then we are going to act.”

Sylvan says people being chased by debt collectors are already in unfortunate circumstances and don’t need to face harassment on top of that.

“Yes, a company has a right to collect the debt but [does not] have a right to harass people and treat them unfairly in doing that,” she says.

Sylvan says the regulator is also putting companies on notice that selling their debt to another business - a practice that is an increasingly popular way to manage cash flow - doesn’t absolve them of responsibility for the way their customers are treated.

In a “factoring” transaction, for example, businesses sell their accounts receivable at a discount to a factor - to gain access to the money now rather than later - and the factor then seeks payment from the debtor.

“When companies on-sell their debt - which is now the norm - our view is that if company ABC has sold it, the debt is still looked at as being company ABC’s. Their reputation is still on the line and they can’t wash their hands of it,” Sylvan says.

“How these people behave is affecting the reputation of those companies. We are very strong on that.”

The Trade Practices Act, administered by the consumer body, and the ASIC Act bar debt collectors from using physical force, harassment or coercion, from misleading or deceiving you (or trying to do so) and from taking unfair advantage of any vulnerability or disability you may have, in what is called “unconscionable” conduct.

These laws protect you as well as your family and associates. They cover creditors collecting a debt themselves, anyone acting on behalf of the creditor, such as a debt collection agency, and anyone “assigned” or sold a debt.

According to the regulators’ joint guide, a debt collector should only contact you when it is “necessary” to do so and when the contact is for a “reasonable purpose”, such as making arrangements for payment.

Contact should be limited - unless agreed otherwise - to a maximum of three phone calls or letters a week but no more than 10 a month. Phone or personal contact can be made only between 7.30am and 9pm on weekdays and 9am to 9pm on weekends. You must be left in peace on national public holidays.

Debt collectors should aim to arrange terms of repayment over the phone and by letter and can only come to your home if there’s no other way to reach you. The guide says that, as a rule, personal visits should be limited to one a fortnight and take place between 9am and 9pm.

“A debt collector should not visit you at your workplace unless you request them to, or if you haven’t given them any other effective way to contact you,” it says. Even then, the debt collector must never reveal information about your situation to anyone else.

WHAT THEY CAN’T DO

In examples of conduct likely to breach consumer protection laws, the guide says debt collectors can’t:

* block your way;

* use obscene, demeaning or racist language;

* leave messages about your situation that others may hear or read;

* say that unpaid debts are a criminal offence (being in debt is not a crime);

* say that your children can be taken away from you;

* send letters demanding payment designed to look like court documents;

* pretend to be, or pretend to act for, a solicitor.

Nor can they make false statements about what will happen if your debt isn’t paid - for instance, by saying your goods will be seized immediately when there’s no mortgage over your goods, and if there were you’d be given 30 days’ notice.

If you dispute a debt, a debt collector should hold fire until the debt has been confirmed. A default can’t appear on your credit report while a debt is still in dispute.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission deputy chairwoman Louise Sylvan says consumers who believe they’ve been treated unreasonably should contact the ACCC or the (ASIC) Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

People who find they are getting behind on debt should contact a free, government-funded credit counselling service earlier rather than later.

Brought to you be www.mrsmortgage.com.au

Disclaimer: This document is for information purposes only, and must not be relied upon as a substitute for professional services or legal advice.

House rules change (Mortgages Australia)

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

Author: Lesley Parker
Date: May 14, 2008
Publication: Sydney Morning Herald

In the space of six months, just about everything anyone thought they knew about the Australian home loan market has changed. Mortgage rates no longer track the official rate set by the central bank; borrowers must jump through hoops rather than fend off overzealous lenders; instead of racing to beat rising house prices, prudent buyers must factor in the possibility of stagnant or even falling values.

Previous assumptions about where the best home loan deals lie need to be examined, then re-examined. Many borrowers spurned non-bank lenders last year, for instance, only to be socked by higher rates from the big banks this year.

RESI Mortgage Corporation’s head of consumer advocacy, Lisa Montgomery, says the result is that people are confused and suffering from inertia when it comes to their home loans.

“A lot of people have lost confidence in all lenders. They’re not sure what they should do,” Montgomery says.

So, let’s look at some of the big questions facing borrowers in this changed landscape.

HOW TIGHT ARE LOANS?

Lenders usually don’t announce the fact that they’re tightening their lending criteria but analysts are unanimous in saying that this is happening.

“We are definitely seeing lenders tightening up their lending standards and lending criteria,” says Mark Hewitt, the general manager of sales and operations with Australian Finance Group, which describes itself as Australia’s largest mortgage broker.

“In the credit crunch, with the difficulty of raising money, lenders are looking for assets to be much cleaner.”

That said, Paul Dowling, the principal analyst with banking research firm East & Partners, says talk of “credit rationing” is overstating things.

“There’s a general move towards more conservative lending but I wouldn’t quite describe it as credit rationing,” he says.

“The banks have money to lend - it’s a question of the [borrower’s] credit profile and the [profit] margin.”

Observers say all lenders are tidying up their credit processes to varying degrees, with the most marked changes coming from smaller lenders, which now have difficulty raising funds on wholesale markets at a reasonable price due to the global credit crunch.

Among the changes, maximum loan-to-valuation ratios are coming down. In other words, people must now stump up a bigger deposit - harking back to the days when the rule of thumb was that potential borrowers had to turn up with a 20 per cent deposit.

Broker group Mortgage Choice says Adelaide Bank, for instance, now requires borrowers to have 10 to 20 per cent of the value of the property as a deposit when they apply for an interest-only loan. Previously the bank would have lent 95 to 100 per cent of the value.

Newcastle Permanent has changed its servicing ratio and borrowers must now have a greater disposable income after loan repayments and other commitments, the broker says.

So-called 105 per cent loans - where you can borrow more than the value of a property - are falling away as well, says Warren O’Rourke, the national corporate affairs manager for Mortgage Choice.

With line-of-credit loans, where you can dip into the equity in your home for other spending, rates in some cases have moved by a greater amount than for the lender’s standard variable loan.

“A number of lenders weren’t necessarily pricing for risk on low-doc loans or line-of-credit loans,” O’Rourke says. “Traditionally there was a premium over standard variable rates but that gradually disappeared in the face of competition. Now they’re starting to rejig them.”

Dowling says there’s been a “significant” drop-off in low-doc loans, which relieve borrowers of the burden of proving their income.
O’Rourke says the bigger lenders are just “tinkering” with their criteria. “In some cases LVRs have changed but [only] on specific product types.”

Denis Orrock, the general manager of researcher InfoChoice, says lenders are looking more closely at borrowers and at property valuations, “particularly for certain property types and in certain areas”.

In July last year Money ran some numbers through online borrowing calculators to see how much lenders were prepared to put on the table for a hypothetical household. At that time, ANZ’s calculator indicated the bank might offer a loan requiring 46.3 per cent of the household’s gross income for repayments.

In a recent repeat of the exercise, ANZ remained the most generous lender but the result came to 41.7 per cent of gross income.

An ANZ representative was unavailable to comment.

BankWest’s result dropped from 43.7 per cent to 39.2 per cent. Its head of mortgages and savings, Paul Vivian, says the Perth lender, owned by British bank HBOS, regularly reviews its criteria. “We’re undergoing one of those reviews right now - they’re just regular reviews and there’s nothing unusual in that,” Vivian says. “But it would be fair to say that, across the industry, there will be a review of credit practices, if not wholesale changes.”

INTEREST RATES

Everyone sighed with relief at the Reserve Bank’s decision last week to leave the official cash rate at 7.25 per cent and normally that would be good news for borrowers. However, lenders have shown in recent months - and weeks - that they’re prepared to lift rates independently of the central bank.

Home loan rates are now determined by the cost of raising funds on the global credit markets, where money has become much more expensive since dodgy US housing loans were bundled up and sold to investors.

“The connection between the Reserve’s official cash rate and the cost of funding for the banks hasn’t quite broken but is almost broken,” Dowling says.

Even if the Reserve Bank remains on hold, market rates may still move higher. What’s worse, there’s no guarantee that once the cycle turns and the Reserve starts to cut rates that lenders will follow.

In Britain, a recent Bank of England rate cut wasn’t passed on uniformly, with new borrowers and those coming off fixed-rate loans reported to have missed out on the savings. Asked what would happen here in the event of an official rate cut, Steve Blinkhorn, the head of home loans for St George Bank, says in the past the bank has been quick to pass on any rate cuts. He says, though, that can’t be guaranteed “in the current environment”.

Dowling says the main hope for borrowers is the banks’ “manic obsession with market share”, which should cap potential rate increases as they fight over customers.

BankWest’s Vivian says moving independently of the Reserve “is a very difficult decision, and we spend an awful lot of time debating how much you move while trying to balance the impact on customers. All of the banks have been forced to move more than we would like.”

BANK OR NON-BANK

Non-bank lenders were the first to feel the impact of the global credit crunch - and to pass on those costs - because they rely on wholesale markets to raise money to fund their lending operations.

In contrast, Australian banks use their depositors’ money to finance a large chunk of their lending - about half of lending for the big banks and about a third in the case of regional banks, Dowling says - so they’re not as exposed to rising rates on global credit markets.

The result was that in the second half of last year many borrowers backed away from non-bank lenders, seeking what they thought would be safe haven with the banks.

Orrock says it’s a mistake to assume that bigger is better. Indeed, the table shows that credit unions and non-bank lenders have many of the best deals (see table on opposite page).

“If you did refinance from a non-bank into one of the banks before January, when the banks also started increasing rates, you’d be feeling cheesed off at the moment,” he says.

The state of play is that banks and non-banks have “topped up” the Reserve Bank’s official cash rate rises by roughly the same amount.

The Reserve has lifted the official cash rate one percentage point since August, while the big banks and non-bank lenders have moved about 1.4 percentage points.

Credit unions and building societies, which have the benefit of being at least partly funded by household deposits, have managed to undercut them, however. Umbrella group Abacus-Australian Mutuals says that, on average, mutuals’ home loan rates are about 0.2 percentage points behind those of the banks.

“There’s some excellent value - a number of credit unions and building societies haven’t passed on rises and, where they have, in general they’ve been much slower to pass higher costs on,” says Abacus’s chief executive, Louise Petschler.

However, she acknowledges there’s a limit to the capacity of some mutuals to meet any surge of interest from borrowers looking for bargain rates.

“For some, it’s a good opportunity - they’re liquid, they’re ready to roll,” she says. For others, it will be a case of managing growth carefully.

Some mutuals are open only to members of certain occupations and are not included in the table.

HOUSE PRICES

In the past borrowers felt compelled to race against rising house prices - borrowing to the hilt to get into the market before prices left them behind.

Some borrowed on the basis that capital growth would leave them debt-free when they sold.

But those assumptions may have to change, too.

UBS’s chief economist, Scott Haslem, says most indicators point to economic growth - and jobs growth - slowing in Australia.
“It seems to us that 15 per cent growth in house prices year on year is unsustainable,” he says. “You’re looking at flat to minus 5 per cent as a realistic range.”

In 2004, house price growth went from 20 per cent to zero in the space of a year, he says. “Our expectation is for a similar effect this time.”

Morgan Stanley market strategist Gerard Minack thinks prices could fall by 10 per cent in the next two to three years if there’s a soft landing for the economy but by as much as 25 to 30 per cent if we fall hard.

The International Monetary Fund recently said Australian property was among the most overvalued in the world and that at least 25 per cent of the increase in value over the past decade couldn’t be justified by fundamentals.

The Housing Industry Association, however, has dismissed talk of widespread price falls as “way off the mark”.

Last week’s Bureau of Statistics data showed a 1.1 per cent rise in house prices nationally in the March quarter, or 13.8 per cent over the year. However, Commonwealth Bank economists say the data masks “significantly divergent trends” in the capital cities.

“Higher interest rates are likely to suppress demand for house purchases in a national sense but there are still likely to be significant differences in demand conditions prevailing in the next five years,” they say in an analysis of the data. “The mining-related capital cities such as Perth, Brisbane, Darwin and now Adelaide, with stronger population, jobs and income growth, are likely to have relatively larger house price rises.”

BE PREPARED

Tighter lending standards mean that people must have their finances in good shape before they approach a lender.
RESI’S head of consumer advocacy, Lisa Montgomery, says a clean credit profile can mean access to a wider range of loans - potentially at better rates - and quicker approval.

“A borrower’s credit rating is one of the most important criteria lenders look at, along with the loan-to-value ratio and the borrower’s ability to service the loan,” she says.

The way you’ve managed all your past and present credit arrangements - such as credit cards, mobile phone accounts and retailers’ interest-free packages - will count for a lot.

“By reviewing your credit profile before applying for a loan, you can identify any issues that may be of concern to lenders and look to clean up any outstanding financial arrangements,” she says.

RESI suggests taking these steps:

Review your credit reference. This includes information such as inquiries about you by lenders, any credit card defaults and bankruptcies. You can check your credit reference at http://www.mycreditfile.com.au.

Consider reducing the number of cards you have or your spending limits. Lenders look at the amount of credit you have access to, not just what you owe. Cut up cards or reduce the limits and you may be eligible for a bigger home loan.

Don’t leave bills in arrears. Even telephone bills can appear on credit reports - nothing’s too small and everything counts. Even if a loan or account is no longer current, past credit problems can still show up.

Explain any arrears or defaults to your lender upfront. It’s better to reveal any past or present credit problems to your lender yourself at the time of application, rather than have them discovered later.

Avoid multiple applications for credit. A credit report shows applications for credit, not just those approved, and multiple inquiries can ring alarm bells with lenders. Apply for credit only once you’ve carried out your initial research.

Check your credit record

Saturday, April 5th, 2008

Article from: Sunday Herald Sun
James Campbell
March 30, 2008 12:00am

CHECKING your credit record is a bit like going to the dentist - many check too late, after the pain sets in. Likewise, they ask to see their credit record only after credit has been refused.

You should check your credit record every year.

Two agencies report on personal credit in Australia, Veda Advantage and, since 2004, Dunn & Bradstreet. Both recommend everyone check their credit record every year.

Damian Karmelich, director of marketing and corporate affairs at Dunn & Bradstreet, says for many people a check-up reveals their identity has been stolen.

“If someone applies for credit in your name it will be recorded on your credit history. Checking your credit history each year tells you if someone is using your name to run up debts,” Mr. Karmelich said.

Make sure all the information on the record is true.

If some of the debts aren’t yours, challenge the record.

Veda Advantage and Dunn & Bradstreet provide credit records free, though a fee is charged if you want it in a hurry.
Apply to both agencies, as the information they hold can differ.

Australia has some of the most restrictive credit reporting laws in the world.

Only name, address, date of birth, five years’ credit applications, defaults, court judgments and bankruptcies are recorded.
Only negative things about your credit history can be recorded.

The Australian Law Reform Commission will hand the Federal Government its final recommendations on changes to privacy laws at the end of May.

The recommendations will include any changes to credit reporting.

Industry observers expect the commission to stick to changes recommended in a draft report last year.

And, if accepted, credit-reporting agencies will able to add to their data:

The type of credit applied for.
Whether it was approved and the date it was approved.
How much credit was granted.
The date credit accounts are closed.
Because credit records show only when credit is applied for, but not whether it is approved or taken up, lenders have no idea of the extent of a customer’s borrowings.
To keep a clean record, be aware of several myths about credit records:
Any unpaid bill -banks, other lenders, utilities, phone or even a fine from your local video shop - can turn up on your credit record.

Once you have defaulted on a debt it stays on your record for five years, regardless of whether you paid.
Bankruptcies stay on your record for seven years.

All defaults - big or small - go on your credit record.

Industry research reveals people who default on small debts - such as phone bills and utilities - are far more likely to default on other forms of credit.

If you are having trouble paying a bill offer to pay some of it.

This will prevent a default being recorded against you.